Apple testing new App Store design that blurs the line between ads and results
Apple is testing an App Store search redesign that makes paid ads visually almost identical to organic results, marked only by a small “Ad” label. Commenters argue this erodes user trust, worsens an already poor app discovery experience, and heightens the risk of scams and copycat apps being mistaken for legitimate ones. Many see it as part of a broader trend of “enshittification,” where dominant tech platforms prioritize ad revenue and growth over user experience, safety, and the premium positioning that once differentiated Apple.
Capitalism, Leadership, and “Enshittification”
- Many see this as the predictable endgame of capitalism: growth targets and stock-linked compensation push leadership toward dark patterns once product-driven expansion plateaus.
- Commenters argue boards systematically select MBA/finance-style CEOs, who optimize for revenue even at UX cost.
- Several frame this as Apple’s “Ballmer moment” or “services pivot,” with spreadsheets displacing product vision and organizational cohesion decaying.
- Others push back: expecting Apple to “care about users” over profits was always naive; this is simply proof the incentives are working.
User Experience, Safety, and Dark Patterns
- Blurring ad vs result is seen as inherently deceptive: it exploits the fact most users don’t carefully scan UI labels.
- People report already seeing scammy or confusing lookalike apps (e.g., authenticator clones, fake ChatGPTs) outranking legitimate ones, undermining Apple’s safety/walled-garden claims.
- Concern that trick installs of the “wrong app” can have serious consequences, especially for family members, elderly, or less technical users.
- Some say they now refuse to tell relatives “just search the App Store,” and instead only share direct links.
Erosion of Apple’s Premium / Trust Position
- A recurring theme: users pay a hardware and ecosystem premium specifically to avoid this kind of hostile design.
- OS-level upsells (News+, Fitness+, AppleCare+, iCloud nags, F1 promotions) are cited as evidence that “freemium” patterns are creeping into a supposedly premium product.
- A number of commenters are actively de-risking from Apple services (Nextcloud, Fastmail, FOSS, GrapheneOS) so they can switch platforms more easily.
Comparisons to Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Android
- Many note Apple is “just catching up” to others:
- Google Search/Play gradually hiding ad markers.
- Amazon search dominated by hard-to-spot “Sponsored” results.
- Windows 11 filled with first- and third‑party promotions.
- Counterpoint: Apple’s brand promise was not to do what everyone else does; matching the industry undermines the rationale for paying the “Apple tax.”
- Some argue Android is at least as bad (or worse) for ads and telemetry; others highlight F-Droid/GrapheneOS as partial escape hatches.
Ad Economics, Trademarks, and Regulation
- Several see this as part of a broader pattern where gatekeepers tax brands on their own names (search ads on trademarks, lookalike apps around official results).
- One camp calls for banning ads on trademarked queries or forcing organic first-position for exact matches; another warns about free-speech and comparative-advertising issues, preferring stricter anti-fraud and clear labeling instead.
- EU rules nominally require ads to be clearly recognizable; commenters say platforms now optimize up to that legal line, making labels as small and low-contrast as possible.
Changing App Ecosystem and User Behavior
- Many say they haven’t “browsed” an app store in years; they only install apps they already know by name. Discovery now happens via friends, social feeds, or search/LLMs.
- Some think the “golden age” of interesting one‑off $2 apps is over. App economics (no paid upgrades, platform cut, ranking algorithms) push devs toward subscriptions, IAPs, and “live service” models.
- There’s frustration that even trivial utilities (timers, flashcards, trackers) demand aggressive weekly/monthly subscriptions, which in turn increases dependence on manipulative funnels like ad-like search placement.
Monopoly, Lock-In, and What’s Next
- Debate over whether this is a “monopoly”: defenders say Android exists; critics point out iOS users have no alternative app distribution, unlike macOS or Android.
- Some argue that clamping down on Apple’s 30% cut simply pushed them to extract via ads instead; others say that’s exactly why regulation should target dark patterns and ad placement rules directly.
- A few predict that AI/agents and system-level app/package discovery may eventually bypass the visible App Store UI—making today’s enshittification both short-sighted and corrosive to long-term trust.