FBI is buying location data to track US citizens, director confirms
Scope of FBI Surveillance
- Many argue the FBI’s mandate to investigate crime does not extend to mass, warrantless surveillance of citizens.
- Others see targeted use of purchased data as potentially useful to prevent serious crimes (e.g., terror attacks), but critics say this justification can excuse almost any abuse.
- There is concern that buying bulk data enables “parallel construction” and investigations without probable cause.
Constitutionality and Legal Loopholes
- Multiple comments view this as an “end-run” around the Fourth Amendment via the third‑party doctrine.
- Carpenter v. United States is cited: it required warrants for historical cell-site data, but its ruling is narrow.
- Some argue buying app/broker location data is legally distinct because users “consent” in app terms; others counter that consent to app collection is not consent to government search.
- Anti‑Pinkerton–style arguments appear: the government shouldn’t be able to contract out what it can’t legally do directly.
- Several note that whether it’s unconstitutional in practice depends on courts that often defer to “national security.”
Data Brokers, Adtech, and Corporate Incentives
- Detailed supply chain described: apps → ad SDKs → real-time bidding exchanges → data harvesters → aggregators → government buyers.
- Accountability is said to “dissolve” at each layer; everyone claims they’re just handling “commercially available data.”
- Core driver is profit: companies collect and sell data because it’s lucrative and weakly regulated.
- Some developers may be unaware that embedded SDKs exfiltrate location data; others knowingly monetize it.
Technical Limits of “Burner” and Privacy Tactics
- Comments highlight how “shadow profiles,” differential identification, and unique movement patterns make true anonymity extremely hard.
- Using burner phones is portrayed as fragile and pattern‑revealing; others push back that some claims are overstated, though still one signal among many.
Policy and Mitigation Proposals
- Suggested reforms:
- Outlaw government purchase of commercial location data without warrants.
- Overturn or greatly narrow the third‑party doctrine.
- Treat location like wiretapped audio/video requiring explicit, per‑party consent.
- Impose severe penalties (including executive liability) for unlawful collection/sale of personal data.
- Make possession of certain data troves itself illegal or highly regulated.
- Some advocate privacy‑preserving products, minimal app installs, DNS/ad blocking, and stricter OS‑level controls, while noting platform owners could do much more but lack incentives.