FBI is buying location data to track US citizens, director confirms

Scope of FBI Surveillance

  • Many argue the FBI’s mandate to investigate crime does not extend to mass, warrantless surveillance of citizens.
  • Others see targeted use of purchased data as potentially useful to prevent serious crimes (e.g., terror attacks), but critics say this justification can excuse almost any abuse.
  • There is concern that buying bulk data enables “parallel construction” and investigations without probable cause.

Constitutionality and Legal Loopholes

  • Multiple comments view this as an “end-run” around the Fourth Amendment via the third‑party doctrine.
  • Carpenter v. United States is cited: it required warrants for historical cell-site data, but its ruling is narrow.
  • Some argue buying app/broker location data is legally distinct because users “consent” in app terms; others counter that consent to app collection is not consent to government search.
  • Anti‑Pinkerton–style arguments appear: the government shouldn’t be able to contract out what it can’t legally do directly.
  • Several note that whether it’s unconstitutional in practice depends on courts that often defer to “national security.”

Data Brokers, Adtech, and Corporate Incentives

  • Detailed supply chain described: apps → ad SDKs → real-time bidding exchanges → data harvesters → aggregators → government buyers.
  • Accountability is said to “dissolve” at each layer; everyone claims they’re just handling “commercially available data.”
  • Core driver is profit: companies collect and sell data because it’s lucrative and weakly regulated.
  • Some developers may be unaware that embedded SDKs exfiltrate location data; others knowingly monetize it.

Technical Limits of “Burner” and Privacy Tactics

  • Comments highlight how “shadow profiles,” differential identification, and unique movement patterns make true anonymity extremely hard.
  • Using burner phones is portrayed as fragile and pattern‑revealing; others push back that some claims are overstated, though still one signal among many.

Policy and Mitigation Proposals

  • Suggested reforms:
    • Outlaw government purchase of commercial location data without warrants.
    • Overturn or greatly narrow the third‑party doctrine.
    • Treat location like wiretapped audio/video requiring explicit, per‑party consent.
    • Impose severe penalties (including executive liability) for unlawful collection/sale of personal data.
    • Make possession of certain data troves itself illegal or highly regulated.
  • Some advocate privacy‑preserving products, minimal app installs, DNS/ad blocking, and stricter OS‑level controls, while noting platform owners could do much more but lack incentives.