All of human cooking compressed into 2 megabytes
Overall Reception of the Paper & Title
- Many find the technical idea interesting but strongly criticize the title “All of human cooking compressed into 2 MB” as misleading and clickbait.
- Commenters note the paper focuses on ingredients and their relationships, not full cooking techniques, procedures, or proportions.
- Several people say the inflated title reduces trust in the work, despite the underlying dataset being “cool” and potentially useful.
Scope, Coverage, and Biases in the Dataset
- The corpus is from 11 sources and a limited set of languages; commenters argue this cannot represent “all” human cooking.
- Missing or underrepresented areas mentioned: African cuisines, Arab/Middle Eastern, Indian/South Asian, some Southeast Asian, and non‑translated French/Italian sources.
- Others point out that English-language recipes for these cuisines do exist, but likely aren’t fully representative or authoritative.
- There is concern that non‑English ingredients were machine‑translated, introducing ambiguity and error.
Ingredients vs Techniques & Compression Claims
- Multiple comments stress that the model captures ingredient co‑occurrence and flavor compatibility more than real “cooking,” which depends heavily on technique and ratios.
- Some argue the space of ingredients and techniques is actually small enough to compress; others demand empirical proof via taste tests and stress that “crib notes” aren’t true mastery.
- People highlight that subtle technique (e.g., fried chicken variations, stew timing, use of acid) is crucial and often missing from algorithmic approaches.
Applications: Flavor Pairing, Substitution, and Tools
- The dataset is seen as promising for:
- Exploring flavor pairings and ingredient embeddings.
- Suggesting substitutions or next-best ingredients.
- Interactive tools such as flavor maps and recipe generators (several linked demos and side projects).
- Some see this as groundwork for specialized cooking models; others think generic LLMs are already “overpowered” for cooking if prompted well.
Cultural & Human Concerns
- Several comments object to omitting major culinary traditions while claiming universality.
- There’s ambivalence about automated or robot cooking: some are excited, others see cooking as core to human culture and creativity and feel automation “robs” something human.
Related Visual & Structural Representations
- A tangential but lively subthread praises schematic/graph-based recipe representations and flowchart-style cookbooks as clearer than traditional prose recipes.