In San Francisco, even $180k tech salaries are no longer enough
Housing costs & core diagnosis
- Broad agreement that SF housing is extremely constrained; many see “build a lot more dense housing + transit” as the only realistic fix.
- Several argue housing is expensive by political choice (zoning, NIMBYism, Prop 13, rent control), not by physical limit.
- Some emphasize land, not buildings, is the appreciating asset; structures themselves depreciate.
Population, demographics, and “fewer people”
- One line of debate: instead of more housing, should there simply be fewer people in SF?
- Critics say non‑coercive population decline is too slow, and coercive methods (forced removals, birth controls, migration permits) are politically and morally unacceptable.
- Others counter that declining birthrates plus limits on immigration can shrink populations over time, citing Japan/Italy, but acknowledge economic downsides.
Zoning, NIMBYism, and land use
- Strong criticism of single‑family zoning and height limits; some call zoning itself illegitimate and historically rooted in racial exclusion.
- Others defend suburban zoning as residents democratically choosing their environment, disputing that today’s motives are racist.
- Disagreement over whether “racist outcomes without intent” should matter, and over whether this is “regulatory capture” by homeowners.
- Rent control and Prop 13 are cited as major distortions: disincentivizing moves, encouraging vacancy, and entrenching incumbents.
Salaries, affordability, and lifestyle
- Mixed views on whether $180k–$200k is “enough”:
- Some say it should easily cover rent, utilities, and groceries, leaving large surplus; they question claims of near-poverty at that income.
- Others note taxes, healthcare, retirement saving, and high rents (e.g., ~$5k for a 1BR) squeeze budgets, especially for singles aiming to save or raise kids.
- Anecdotes show past eras when much lower salaries supported solo living in SF; that seems impossible now.
Remote work, relocation, and inequality
- Founders report $180k in the Bay now mostly attracts juniors; remote/global hiring is used to cut costs.
- Some see remote work and satellite offices as pressure valves; others note firms also chase cheaper labor abroad and AI automation.
- Several argue that wealth inequality and geographic clustering of elites drive urban land costs; housing policy alone may not fix it.
- A minority argue that more building worsens local cost of living and prefer heavy taxation of high earners and corporations.