Run full iOS 16.5 firmware on Android Devices
A new project shows iOS 16.5 firmware booting on certain Android phones and in QEMU, using AI-assisted reverse engineering to adapt Apple’s XNU kernel to non-Apple hardware. Commenters are split on its practical value: core features like cellular, Bluetooth, charging, Apple ID, and App Store access don’t yet work, limiting it to a research bench rather than a daily-driver OS. Still, many see it as a significant proof of concept with implications for jailbreaking, device ownership, potential iPhone clones, and the broader impact of AI on closed ecosystems.
Overall reaction
- Many find the project “mad” and impressive, akin to Hackintosh for phones.
- Others question its practical value, calling it a cool but mostly research/hobby effort, “on par with cutting off my leg before playing soccer.”
Technical state and limitations
- Runs iOS 16.5 on selected Android devices and QEMU; later iOS versions are believed harder due to newer security (e.g., Secure Page Table Monitor / Trusted Execution Monitor).
- Current major gaps:
- No App Store, Apple ID, iCloud, or other iServices, partly due to missing Secure Enclave / FairPlay support.
- Cellular and Bluetooth do not work yet.
- Charging under the custom kernel does not work; the phone only discharges.
- It is framed as a “research bench,” not a daily-driver ROM: sessions are time-limited and return logs to a loader.
- Some are surprised camera works, noting other alt-OS projects often fail there.
Use cases and motivations
- Research/jailbreaking value: full kernel control, fully jailbroken-style iOS not possible on locked iPhones.
- Curiosity / hacking culture: similar motivation to Hackintosh and postmarketOS.
- Niche desires:
- Running iOS-only music production apps or other iOS-exclusive software on cheaper Android tablets/phones.
- Blue iMessage bubbles are mentioned, but others doubt iMessage will work due to device attestation.
- Several argue they’d rather see Android or Linux on Apple hardware instead.
Security, legality, and clones
- Concerns about:
- Security hardening making future ports much harder.
- Malware/spyware risk in trendy AI-assisted firmware projects that spread quickly.
- Debate about potential for realistic iPhone clones; some think this will boost convincing fakes, others note Apple’s secure boot chain and Secure Enclave make true replicas extremely difficult.
- Legal risks (DMCA, trademark/counterfeit law) are brought up, with comparisons to fake watches and prior Apple IP battles.
AI’s role and future prospects
- Multiple commenters note that AI assistants are already being used to:
- Pilot phones over adb/fastboot and iterate kernels.
- Reverse-engineer and customize firmware (including non-phone devices like Garmin).
- Some expect agents to rapidly extend device support and usability in 6–12 months; others doubt portability and stability, given iOS’s tight coupling to specific hardware.