Some fish live beyond 100 and get healthier as they age

Certain freshwater fish like bigmouth buffalo appear to live for more than a century, with older individuals showing stronger immune systems and signs of lower physiological stress than younger ones. Commenters explore how scientists estimate such extreme ages using otolith “rings” and DNA methylation, debating the reliability of these methods and how life-history traits like rare breeding events can favor extreme longevity. The thread branches into broader questions about aging, cancer risk across species, and what very long or indefinite lifespans might mean for human society and inequality.

Access to article & main finding

  • Original link is paywalled; archive link shared.
  • Summary from comments: very old bigmouth buffalo have stronger immune responses and lower neutrophil/lymphocyte stress ratios. They appear to get healthier with age.
  • Hypothesized reason: they evolved very long lifespans because suitable breeding conditions are rare and sporadic.

Aging methods in fish (otoliths, scales, DNA)

  • Age is estimated via otolith “rings” (ear stones), analogous to tree rings; some mention using scales or fin rays for other species.
  • Several commenters stress otoliths are generally the best available method in temperate fishes but still imperfect.
  • Others argue ring reading can be very subjective, often poorly validated, and may significantly misage fish, especially at high ages.
  • Environmental influences (temperature, climate variation) are acknowledged to affect ring formation, but seasonal cycles are thought to remain dominant.
  • DNA methylation is mentioned as an alternative aging method with strong correlation to age but higher cost.

Population structure and longevity

  • Reported that ~90% of Apache Lake buffalofish are >85 years old; some find this “fishy,” suggesting possible miscounted rings or unusual population dynamics.
  • Counterargument: many fish species have very high juvenile mortality and low adult mortality, so surviving cohorts can be heavily skewed old.

Immune function, survivorship bias, and selection

  • Debate whether “older fish have stronger immune systems” versus “only fish with strong immune systems survive to old age” (survivorship bias).
  • Discussion links this to natural selection and kin selection: long-lived, still-reproductive or protective elders can increase gene success.

Comparisons, cancer, and body size

  • Commenters compare longevity across cold-blooded vs warm-blooded animals and note continuous growth may dilute cellular damage.
  • Discussion of cancer incidence vs body size and lifespan; references to whales, elephants, and “Peto’s paradox.”
  • Within a species, more cells and faster metabolism are said to generally mean higher cancer risk, but between species there are compensating mechanisms.

Aging, life extension, and ethics

  • Bigmouth buffalo’s negligible senescence triggers wide discussion of human aging and life extension.
  • A fable about defeating death is cited; some see current medicine as already “wounding the dragon.”
  • Strong thread on equity: concern that radical life extension would initially benefit only the wealthy, potentially entrenching power.
  • Counterarguments: medicine historically diffuses to wider populations; governments and insurers would have incentives to broaden access; blocking progress for equity reasons is contested.
  • Fictional portrayals (e.g., worlds where only elites are immortal) used to explore risks of immortal tyrants and ossified elites vs potentially more adaptable long-lived individuals.

Exercise, metabolism, and lifespan hypotheses

  • One line of discussion: lower metabolic rate and energy expenditure in cold-blooded animals may contribute to longevity, possibly via fewer free radicals.
  • Another mentions a “fixed heartbeats” idea across species (about 1.5 billion beats), suggesting slower heart rates correlate with longer life, though this is presented as a theory, not proven fact.
  • Several commenters emphasize that, even if intense activity slightly reduced lifespan, the quality-of-life gains from fitness would be worth it.

Overpopulation and expansion

  • Life extension raises overpopulation concerns for some.
  • Responses include: declining birth rates, the role of resource misuse vs sheer numbers, and speculation about expanding to the Moon or Mars.
  • Side debate on feasibility and cost of off-world colonies vs better planetary defense or infrastructure on Earth.

Environmental and other notes

  • One commenter wonders how extremely old fish cope with long-term bioaccumulation of pollutants (plastics, mercury); no clear answers in-thread.
  • Brief mentions of lobsters and an exceptionally long-lived koi as other longevity examples.
  • Several joke threads (water, fish oil, vaccines, immortality elixirs) prompt meta-comments about low-effort humor versus more serious discussion.