A ragtag band of internet friends became the best at forecasting world events

Role of Base Rates and Forecasting Methods

  • Many comments focus on “base rates” as an anchor for probabilistic forecasts.
  • Supporters say base rates provide an uninformed prior and a sanity check before adjusting for new information.
  • Critics argue some base-rate constructions (e.g., mixing different historical periods or arbitrary Laplace priors) are hand-wavy and can look like numerology.
  • Several note that base rates are only one ingredient; good forecasters combine multiple models and qualitative analysis.

Calibration, Scoring, and Validation

  • Question raised: how can single-event probabilities (e.g., “China invades Taiwan”) ever be validated?
  • Answers: look at large sets of predictions; if 8% events happen ~8% of the time, you’re calibrated.
  • Mention of Brier scores, cross-entropy, and “proper scoring rules” that reward honest probabilities and contrarian correctness.
  • Some remain skeptical, arguing heterogenous, unique geopolitical events are hard to aggregate meaningfully.

Comparison to Experts, Finance, and Markets

  • Debate over whether such forecasters should be competing in financial markets (“major leagues”) if they’re really good.
  • Responses: markets are different (noise, incentives, domain knowledge) and many forecasters prioritize social impact projects over profit.
  • Some argue if predictions are +EV, they should translate into trades; others suspect survivorship bias or luck.
  • Prediction markets are viewed as a useful mechanism to encode beliefs and measure forecasting skill.

Black Swans, Nuclear War, and Risk Perception

  • Several argue forecasting rare catastrophic events is structurally biased toward “no,” and underweights impact.
  • Others counter that proper scoring and long track records still make it meaningful to estimate low probabilities.
  • Discussion of climate change forecasts: climate models provide physics but forecasting emissions and policy is more political and uncertain.

Usefulness and Limits of Forecasting

  • Some see forecasting as intellectually rewarding and practically useful for policy, finance, and risk management.
  • Others doubt decision-makers will act on forecasts, or compare the practice to horoscopes when applied to unique geopolitical events.
  • A few note that even if probabilities are philosophically messy, bets and markets force coherent, testable beliefs.