FTC sues Adobe for hiding fees and inhibiting cancellations
Scope of FTC Case and Adobe’s Practices
- Many commenters report first‑hand experiences that align with the FTC complaint:
- “Annual paid monthly” plans presented like cancellable month‑to‑month, but with hidden early‑termination fees (often 50% of remaining year).
- Cancellation flows described as confusing, multi‑step, and designed to mislead or discourage completion.
- Some say they could not disable auto‑renew while keeping service through the paid term; only a narrow “cancellation window” worked cleanly.
- There are anecdotes of:
- Subscriptions continuing after attempted cancellation.
- Old perpetual licenses becoming unusable when activation servers were shut down.
- Aggressive upsell and “save” offers during cancellation.
Reactions to the FTC Action
- Strong support: many think Adobe is a “uniquely bad actor” and hope for large fines, mandated changes, and refunds of past cancellation fees.
- Some skepticism that penalties will be only a “rounding error” and treated as a cost of doing business.
- Several note the FTC has recently become more active against tech companies and see this as part of a broader shift.
Broader Critique of Subscription & Dark Patterns
- Similar complaints aimed at:
- SiriusXM, gyms (especially in‑person‑only cancellations), newspapers, NYT/The Athletic, Audible, cable/ISP promos, and some banking practices.
- Credit card updater services that keep merchants charging even after card replacement.
- Dark patterns highlighted:
- Phone‑only cancellation, limited business hours, confusing UI, positive‑colored “keep” buttons, hidden fees, and “always on sale” pricing.
Alternatives, Lock‑In, and Piracy
- Many users say they’ve moved (or want to move) to:
- Affinity suite, Capture One, DaVinci Resolve, Foxit, Photopea, Krita, GIMP, Inkscape, Blender, etc.
- However, several professionals argue:
- Adobe remains functionally superior in key areas (Photoshop, Lightroom DAM, Illustrator, InDesign, After Effects, complex text layout).
- File‑format and ecosystem lock‑in keep teams and studios on Adobe even when they dislike its business practices.
- Some describe historical tolerance for piracy as a “get them hooked” strategy; others note SaaS enabled much tighter control and higher, recurring revenue.
Ethics and Corporate Incentives
- Debate over whether working at companies like Adobe meaningfully affects personal ethics.
- Repeated theme: public‑company pressure for continual growth and “rent‑seeking” encourages enshittification (higher prices, worse UX, lock‑in) once a firm has market dominance.