Marine pilot loses command after ejecting from F-35B that kept flying
Aircraft tracking, stealth, and beacons
- Commenters note the jet does have a transponder, but it failed with the electrical malfunction.
- Some argue a peacetime “Find My Jet”–style beacon or stronger tracking would be reasonable; others counter that active beacons are a liability in wartime, aiding enemy recovery and reverse‑engineering.
- Pilot-rescue beacons exist, but are intentionally pilot‑controlled so as not to give away location to adversaries.
What actually failed and was still working
- Reported failures: primary radios, TACAN, ILS, helmet display, and main panoramic cockpit display, following a lightning strike and mode changes near approach in heavy rain.
- Reported as still working: standby flight display and a “basically functional” backup radio, plus intact fly‑by‑wire controls.
- Several argue these were sufficient to maintain controlled flight, climb, coordinate with tower/wingman, and attempt a landing.
Ejection decision and the flight manual
- Manual said to eject if the jet is “out of control” below a certain altitude; investigators later judged this definition too broad.
- Supportive voices say: low altitude, IMC, repeated display glitches, known F‑35 electrical issues, and recent fatal mishaps make ejecting a rational life‑preserving choice.
- Critics say: he didn’t sufficiently troubleshoot, didn’t exploit backup instruments or radio, and bailed from a flyable aircraft that went on to fly ~64 miles and ~11 minutes.
VMX‑1 role and loss of command
- VMX‑1’s mission is to validate and refine tactics and procedures; its commander is expected to go beyond “just follow the book.”
- Many see removal from command (but not flying duties) as consistent with that higher bar for judgment.
- Others see him as a scapegoat after multiple Marine Class A mishaps and note the decision may deter future pilots from ejecting when they should.
Risk, cost, and values
- Debate over whether a ~$100M jet is “worth more” than a pilot: some unequivocally say yes; others stress pilots are harder to replace and that doctrine historically prioritizes lives.
- Concern that an uncrewed F‑35 wandering over populated areas posed major public‑safety and political risk.
Broader F‑35 and automation debate
- Thread revisits long‑running F‑35 criticisms: cost overruns, complexity, UI design (PCD, radio controls), and reliability.
- Defenders say issues are typical for 5th‑gen fighters and the jet is now operationally successful for many allies.
- Some propose more autonomy or all‑drone fleets; others reply that current reality still requires manned fighters, especially in high‑EW, high‑threat environments.