Investigation uncovers two sophisticated telecom surveillance campaigns

Researchers have uncovered covert surveillance campaigns that exploit weaknesses in global telecom networks to track mobile phones, with indications that commercial vendors – including some based in Israel and the UK – are behind the operations. Commenters highlight how legacy protocols like SS7, poor internal controls at carriers, and data brokerage ecosystems make it easy for states, companies, and even rogue employees to obtain precise location data with little oversight. Many express skepticism that law enforcement or corporate governance can meaningfully curb abuse, seeing mass phone tracking as an increasingly normalized feature of modern life rather than an exception.

Insider abuse and telco security controls

  • Several anecdotes describe telco employees abusing internal access to track ex-partners, sometimes without leaving obvious logs (e.g., packet captures, access to raw telemetry).
  • Others, including people claiming telco experience, strongly dispute how easy this is: they say access to enriched location data is tightly restricted, CRM data is segregated, and lawful intercept systems are on separate, hidden paths.
  • There is disagreement on how many employees at large operators can see both location and customer data; some say “almost none,” others say “dozens” at big carriers.

Law enforcement and accountability

  • Multiple commenters describe police largely ignoring stalking and tech-enabled harassment, even when evidence is provided, across the US, Australia, UK, and Europe.
  • Others insist that in their jurisdictions such allegations would be investigated and could lead to charges, but this is met with skepticism and counterexamples.
  • Telco governance and privacy offices are portrayed by some as serious and responsive, by others as theater, with audits allegedly being fudged.

Technical vectors: SS7, 4G/5G, lawful intercept

  • SS7 is repeatedly cited as a long-known, unfixed weak point enabling silent location tracking and protocol downgrade attacks, even for 5G users.
  • Some note that “ghost” or shell operators can abuse interconnect signaling outside normal legal processes.
  • Lawful intercept and emergency services paths are described as intentionally opaque, sometimes even from normal telco monitoring tools.

Global data markets and state abuse

  • Russia is mentioned as an example where telco and travel data reportedly leak onto black markets and have been used by journalists and opposition figures; some initially claim these DBs are fake, others counter with documented uses.
  • Comments suggest similar surveillance and leakage in the UK, Israel, and Australia, and that “everyone does it, some just got caught.”

Israel, Gaza, and geopolitics

  • The Israeli surveillance/export industry is linked in discussion to broader military and intelligence practices.
  • Gaza and neighboring regions are described by several as a “testing ground” or “laboratory” for advanced tracking and targeting technologies, with concern they will be deployed more broadly.

Privacy attitudes and coping strategies

  • Many argue most people no longer care about being tracked, citing mass use of big tech apps with location access.
  • Suggested mitigations range from disabling background location, to keeping SIMs in dumb phones at home, to using data-only SIMs and encrypted apps, to leaving phones behind entirely.
  • Others consider privacy effectively dead and foresee pervasive surveillance enabling “tailor-made hells” and black markets for “private comms” tech.