Jared Kushner Hacked Phone Reveals Secret Negotiations, Millions in Transactions

Allegations that Jared Kushner’s iPhone was hacked in 2017, exposing secret diplomatic negotiations and large money flows from Gulf states, prompt wider concerns about corruption and foreign influence at the highest levels of U.S. government. Commenters argue over why such claims receive relatively muted coverage compared to scandals like Hunter Biden’s laptop, and whether the media, legal system, and political parties are structurally disinclined to hold powerful figures accountable. The thread broadens into worries that the U.S. is sliding toward entrenched kleptocracy, with presidential pardons, weakened norms, and opaque international dealings eroding trust in democratic institutions.

Scale and Nature of Corruption

  • Many commenters see the Kushner story as one piece of a much larger pattern: not just “corruption” but systemic kleptocracy / kakistocracy and active “disassembly of the state.”
  • Comparisons are made to the post-Soviet collapse and oligarchic asset-stripping, with a view that USD-denominated assets are being converted into raw political power and control over real resources.
  • Some argue there will be no full unraveling or accountability under current institutions.

Pardons, Prosecution, and Constitutional Limits

  • Extensive debate on presidential pardon power: some call it a historic mistake and want it effectively abolished or constrained.
  • Clarifications: pardons cover federal crimes only, not state-level offenses or civil liability; foreign prosecutions and extradition are mentioned as theoretical risks.
  • Suggestions include requiring congressional or bipartisan approval for pardons, or limiting pre-emptive pardons—others counter that this would require a constitutional amendment and is politically impossible.
  • Some stress that even failed prosecutions can expose corruption and delegitimize a “rotten” system; others are pessimistic that courts (especially the Supreme Court) would check abuses.

Kushner’s Role and Legitimacy

  • A recurring concern is that a presidential relative with no electoral mandate was effectively conducting foreign policy.
  • There is confusion and disagreement over whether he was acting as an official envoy versus as a private citizen, noting the article focuses on pre-2020 but current disputes about his status exist.

Hacking, Intelligence, and Evidence

  • The thread notes that Russian military intelligence allegedly hacked Kushner’s iPhone, and Dutch intelligence later gained access via a recruited GRU spy.
  • Some find the idea of allied services accessing a senior U.S. official’s device disturbingly casual; others point out the U.S. has similarly spied on allies.
  • Several commenters remain skeptical: they worry hacked or seized devices can have incriminating material planted, and some suspect a “limited hangout.”
  • Others defend the underlying reporting as coming from an experienced national-security investigative journalist.

Media Treatment vs. Hunter Biden

  • Multiple comments contrast the relatively muted treatment of the Kushner story with the saturation coverage of Hunter Biden’s laptop.
  • Explanations offered include: the laptop’s salacious personal content; direct media access to its data versus foreign-intel-controlled phone data; partisan narratives about media bias; and disagreement over whether the Biden story was buried or heavily publicized.

Broader Political and Structural Concerns

  • Many see both current and prior U.S. administrations as “owned” or heavily influenced by foreign and private interests.
  • Some advocate radical decentralization of power, with proposed legal caps on wealth and “overaccumulation of power” as a crime.
  • Others argue cynicism is understandable but warn against sliding into nihilism, noting other democracies have lived with normalized corruption for decades.

HN Meta and Political Content

  • There is visible frustration about this thread being flagged or buried, interpreted by some as deliberate suppression of political discussion.
  • Others attribute it to users who dislike political topics on a tech forum, noting the difference between the front page and the “/active” view.