TikTok Is Destroying Itself from the Inside Out

TikTok’s rapid shift toward longer videos, aggressive in-app shopping, and pervasive advertising is seen by many as a textbook case of “enshittification,” where a platform’s user experience deteriorates as it chases revenue. Commenters contrast TikTok’s early, quirky, highly engaging content with today’s more homogenized, commercial feed, and debate whether this will actually harm its growth or simply mirror the trajectories of Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. The thread also raises concerns about addiction, moderation harms, propaganda and state influence, while noting that social media platforms ultimately serve advertisers first, not users.

Perceived Harm and Addiction

  • Many see TikTok (and similar apps) as predatory on attention span, designed for dopamine-driven endless scrolling and addiction.
  • Some users report deleting it improved sleep, well‑being, and even phone battery life.
  • Others argue this panic echoes historical moral concerns about books, TV, video games, etc.

Comparison to Other Social Platforms

  • Several commenters stress TikTok is not uniquely harmful; Facebook, Twitter/X, YouTube, Reddit, etc. use the same attention-harvesting patterns.
  • Others note all major platforms are undergoing “enshittification”: initial user focus, then creator focus, finally advertiser/extraction focus.
  • There is extensive side debate about Twitter/X’s health (user counts, finances, advertiser loss, content quality), illustrating that “doing fine” is contested.

Product Changes, TikTok Shop, and Enshittification

  • Many feel TikTok’s shift to longer videos, photo slideshows, and aggressive TikTok Shop integration is eroding what made it special (short, quirky, serendipitous content).
  • Feeds are perceived as increasingly dominated by commission-based product shills and low-quality dropship goods.
  • Some view this as a rational business move: longer content enables higher-value ads, and Shop lets TikTok skim e‑commerce transactions, QVC‑style.
  • A minority argue that flooding the platform with shops first is strategic, to later filter to the best ones.

Positive Experiences and Unique Value

  • A significant contingent praises TikTok for highly personalized, educational, and niche content (e.g., crafts, science, remote lives, deep dives under 5 minutes).
  • They argue the “magic” was real in early years: surprising, creative, and globally connective, even if overall metrics now still look good.

Moderation, Labor, and Misinformation

  • Accounts from a former moderator describe traumatic exposure to extreme content and intense performance quotas, leading to PTSD-like effects; similar issues are noted at other big platforms.
  • Users report seeing substantial misinformation and astroturfed content; experiences differ on whether TikTok effectively moderates this.

Geopolitics and Propaganda Concerns

  • Some characterize TikTok as a Chinese propaganda tool or de‑platforming play against U.S. tech; others say it’s no more propagandistic than Western platforms.
  • There is disagreement over how much governments (Chinese or U.S.) actually steer content; several links and anecdotes are cited on both sides, but overall influence remains unclear.