Show HN: A user-friendly UI for viewing and editing Markdown files
Feature set & capabilities
- Many commenters want a clear feature list before downloading: checkboxes, Mermaid, folding, search/replace, multi‑cursor, tracked changes, math, images, raw HTML, MDX, alternate render engines (e.g., pandoc).
- Some note it auto-adds YAML front matter (title/subtitle) even when files already have headers, and users can’t easily remove or control it.
- Lack of built‑in math editor and advanced blocks (Kanban, diagrams, complex widgets) is noted by some as a limitation.
UX, projects, and workflow
- A major complaint is the forced “project” (vault) model before opening a single markdown file; users want quick “open README.md” behavior.
- Some report confusing or broken states after project creation (blank screen, no way to reset without reinstall).
- Window behavior on macOS (e.g., can’t drag by title area) and ultra-minimal UI without obvious formatting controls are criticized by users who prefer traditional WYSIWYG toolbars.
Comparisons to existing tools
- Strong comparisons to Typora, Obsidian, iA Writer, VS Code with markdown extensions, MarkText, Zettlr, ghostwriter, Logseq, etc.
- Some say it looks nearly identical to Typora but is free; others argue Typora’s price is reasonable and feature-rich.
- Obsidian’s “vault-centric” model is cited as similar and also limiting for one‑off file editing.
Licensing, implementation, and security
- Initially no license was present; an MIT license was later added.
- Built with Tauri and Tiptap (on top of ProseMirror) is noted; some downplay this as just a normal choice of editor component.
- Multiple macOS users report “app is damaged” and notarization warnings; the need to run
xattrworkarounds is a deterrent. - One comment challenges marketing around “secure/local,” noting no clear encryption/security features.
Target users & positioning
- Unclear whether it’s aimed at non‑technical users, developers, or note-takers.
- Some see potential as a simple, clean markdown editor; others argue that existing IDEs and editors already cover most developer needs.
- Several suggest the app needs a clearer purpose, stronger onboarding, and configuration around front matter, syncing, and linking to stand out.