Xerox to cut 15% of its workforce

Xerox’s plan to cut 15% of its workforce raises questions about the timing of layoffs, with some arguing post-holiday cuts soften the blow and others saying earlier notice would better protect employees’ finances. Commenters see the move as part of a long decline for a company still heavily reliant on shrinking print and copier markets, criticizing jargon-filled leadership messaging, shareholder-first management, and underinvestment in product development. There is also concern for the impact on Rochester, New York, where Xerox still has a major presence despite years of downsizing and outsourcing.

Layoff Timing and Employee Impact

  • Mixed views on announcing cuts after the holidays.
    • Some prefer earlier notice to curb holiday spending, travel, and family commitments.
    • Others prefer not to carry layoff news into the holidays or to avoid job-hunting in late December when hiring slows.
  • Several note that Q1 layoffs can be slightly better for job searches because budgets reset and hiring freezes ease.
  • Concerns about severance start dates: some would trade “nicer timing” for more weeks of paid runway.

Corporate Strategy, Buzzwords, and Investor Communication

  • Press-release language (“business unit operating model”, “balanced execution priorities”) is widely mocked as empty buzzwords.
  • Some argue these vague statements are intentional to avoid legal risk and that real detail is reserved for analyst calls.
  • Others question whether giving extra clarity to select investors skirts disclosure rules, but it’s described as a tolerated gray area.

State of Xerox’s Business

  • Many express surprise Xerox still exists; stock performance is described as long-term poor.
  • Core business is seen as printers, copiers, and related services in a shrinking, commoditized print market.
  • Some devices and toner are still designed or manufactured in the US, but much hardware is outsourced or from former subsidiaries.
  • Attempts to move into services and 3D printing are mentioned, but perceived as weak or unclear.
  • Website and job postings are described as reflecting hollowing-out and slow decline.

Local and Historical Context

  • In Rochester, layoffs are seen as part of a decades-long trend, with many ex-Xerox/Kodak staff moving to local startups or universities, or returning as contractors.
  • Corporate HQ being geographically separated from the main workforce is debated; some see it as a symptom of decline, others note counterexamples.

MBAs, Shareholder Value, and “Enshittification”

  • Strong criticism that financial-engineering and shareholder-primacy thinking hollowed out product-focused firms like Xerox.
  • Debate over whether a company’s sole purpose is returns to investors vs. broader responsibilities to society and employees.
  • Disagreement on whether growth-at-all-costs inevitably leads to short-termism and deterioration of products and services.