British duo arrested for SMS phishing via homemade cell tower

Police in the UK have arrested two people accused of using a homemade mobile base station to send large volumes of phishing SMS messages, highlighting how legacy cellular standards like 2G can be abused to impersonate legitimate networks. Commenters explain that modern phones often still fall back to insecure protocols without mutual authentication, making them vulnerable to rogue base stations built from off‑the‑shelf SDR hardware, even as regulators and mobile operators deploy spectrum monitoring and spam-reporting schemes (such as forwarding texts to “7726”) to detect abuse. The case also prompts debate over continued reliance on SMS for critical services, the balance between technical ingenuity and criminal intent, and the broader surveillance capabilities inherent in mobile infrastructure.

Cloudflare / Access to Official Sites

  • Several commenters can’t access the original police site due to Cloudflare Turnstile loops, especially on some mobile browsers and older/odd setups.
  • Others report no issues even with VPNs, custom ROMs, Firefox + uBlock, etc., suggesting blocks are mostly network-based (Tor, CGNAT, “unfriendly” countries) rather than browser-specific.
  • One participant offers to relay HAR traces to the Turnstile team; some debugging attempts are mentioned.

Radio Legality, Spectrum Monitoring, and Detection

  • Running a private transmitting antenna on licensed bands is widely seen as a fast route to police/regulator visits and equipment seizure.
  • In the UK, listening to radio traffic not intended for you is claimed to be illegal with substantial fines; cited as reason there’s no LiveATC coverage there.
  • Several believe there is active “spectrum monitoring” by regulators, police, military, and possibly operators, especially in central London; skepticism exists about how extensive this is, particularly for Ofcom.
  • Mobile operators already have dense RF infrastructure and are thought to be capable of triangulating rogue emitters; hams also reportedly dislike spectrum abusers.

How Fake Towers and SMS Attacks Work

  • SMS rides on cellular signaling channels; early designs assumed attacks were infeasible and did not anticipate today’s threats.
  • 2G lacks mutual authentication and allows a rogue base station to: jam real towers, force a downgrade, disable encryption (A5/0), and impersonate networks—letting attackers send arbitrary texts or act as MITM.
  • Many phones are backward-compatible by default, making downgrade attacks practical. A SIM-controlled bit governs whether users see warnings about unencrypted sessions; usually disabled.
  • Some Android/iOS devices offer a dedicated “disable 2G” toggle; others only provide coarse “preferred network” menus, frustrating users who cannot turn 2G off despite its insecurity.
  • There is debate over whether SMS was a “hack” on unused signaling capacity or a fully provisioned service, and over how reliable SMS delivery historically was.

Spam Reporting and 7726/33700 Schemes

  • Many carriers let users forward spam to 7726 (“SPAM”), or analogous numbers like 33700 in France, for investigation and blocking.
  • Forwarding typically involves sending the spam body, then replying with the sender’s number; this relies on carrier-side logs, not trusted sender IDs.
  • Effectiveness under a compromised cell is questioned; suggested mitigation is to move to another cell before reporting.
  • Tools like CellMapper and handset field-test modes are mentioned for identifying connected cells.

Use of SMS vs Alternatives

  • Despite perceptions that SMS is obsolete, in the UK it remains heavily used by government and businesses (NHS, tax authority, 2FA, appointment reminders).
  • SMS is valued as a lowest-common-denominator channel: works on dumb phones and doesn’t require apps or email.
  • Some note gaps: VoIP/landline users may not have SMS; landline SMS can be read out via basic TTS with poor handling of names.
  • There is criticism of SMS as a weak basis for banking/2FA, but also pushback when such comments are purely inflammatory.

City of London Police and Institutional Context

  • Clarification: “City of London” is a small, wealthy financial district with its own police force, distinct from the broader Metropolitan Police.
  • Reputation is mixed: some describe them as highly competent, well-resourced, well-educated, and focused on complex financial/cyber crime; others see them as over-aligned with copyright and streaming enforcement.
  • Crime stats are said to be low, but there is skepticism about underreporting; anecdotally, they have rapid response and dense surveillance, described by some as a “panopticon”.
  • Governance is unusual: businesses dominate local voting; the City Corporation doubles as the police authority, influencing priorities.

Building DIY Base Stations

  • Multiple commenters state that building a BTS with SDR and open-source stacks (GSM through 5G) is technically straightforward and can be a weekend project.
  • The real barrier is regulation: transmitting on licensed cellular spectrum without owning/leasing it is illegal and actively monitored; examples include drone-based RF hunting.
  • Some discuss running personal telephony over VoIP + VPN instead of RF, but emphasize that mobility and regulatory compliance are the hard parts.
  • One note claims A5/1 rainbow tables and cheap SDRs could allow interception if the attacker used a legal provider for transmission, implying these arrested actors were “amateurish”; others see the police narrative as overstated.

Criminal Skillsets and Enforcement Approach

  • Several reflect on the irony that people capable of building rogue cell towers could contribute positively in legitimate security or telecom roles.
  • Explanations offered: prior convictions limiting employability, higher and faster returns from fraud, and lower barriers than building a lawful carrier.
  • Views diverge on recruiting such individuals: some suggest intelligence agencies might be interested; others argue RF skills are common and that deliberate large-scale fraud justifies firm criminal prosecution.